A little over two months ago, we released the video, "Entrepreneurs can change the world" to spark a movement to help turnaround the economy, remind entrepreneurs why they started out in the first place, and inspire others to go out there and realize their dreams. As an entrepreneur who serves other entrepreneurs, I hear stories about growth each day: how people went out and offered new products and services, created jobs, and used their entrepreneurial passion to make a difference.
Our goal with the video wasn't to generate more sales. Instead, right from the start, our success metrics were: 'number of video views', and 'comments and ratings' (both on YouTube and other social sites). We also released all of the data about our campaign so that other entrepreneurs could use it as an opportunity to learn about this kind of unique approach, and the costs involved. In other words, we made the entire project (and our strategy) transparent. With just under 200,000 views, over 200 comments and 575 ratings on YouTube, the response has been truly amazing.
As I've described in previous posts, tremendous effort was spent by talented individuals (not large agencies) to create an authentic and inspirational message with words and design, and also music--we even had an original score created by Carly Comando in order to give the video a fresh sound. It turned out great, and the video's received a huge, positive response.
Imagine my great surprise then, just a few days ago, when I got phone calls and emails from people asking if Grasshopper had done a TV commercial with American Express. People were telling me they had heard "the song from the Grasshopper video" on TV, and I had to explain that, no, Grasshopper had not partnered with AmEx, or permitted them to use any of the elements of our campaign. It wasn't until a couple of days later when I was watching the news that I heard music very similar to Carly Comando's score emanating from the TV. I ran to check it out and sure enough, it was the AmEx ad everyone was telling me about. As I later found out, not only was the music the similar, but so were the words and overall message.
After a little research, I discovered that Ogilvy & Mather was American Express' ad agency. I then researched a lot more and discovered that Ogilvy & Mather had visited the Grasshopper website page regarding our campaign multiple times prior to the release of the American Express ad on TV (thank you, Google Analytics). I reached out to the video's producer and writer, Sonja Jacob. She also checked her site analytics and found that Ogilvy & Mather had visited her site multiple times. And can you guess which page they spent the most time on? Yup, you got it--the page where she discussed her work with Grasshopper and displayed the video. Curious.
It's important to note that the amount of time Ogilvy & Mather spent on our website is very high. Below are the Google Analytics reports from both websites for May 1st to July 26th. As a result of this data I had to conclude that at minimum, Ogilvy was aware of what we created (and that is the absolute minimum you can conclude--although you can extrapolate much more). With site analytics to tell the story, at the very least one can say that it wasn't just a coincidence that American Express came out with an ad that sounded a lot like ours only two months after our video was released.
You might also want to listen to the radio ads The Cultivated Word created for the movement, which were also on Sonja's website. I mean, you might as well--Ogilvy & Mather definitely checked them out while they were there.
It bothers me that a very large ad agency would "borrow" from not one entrepreneurial company (Grasshopper) but also an independent communications professional we hired to produce a video. But what bothers me more is that the message is being used for direct commercial gain by AmEx to promote another venture of theirs, OPEN Forum. Obviously, we sell a product at Grasshopper, but the purpose of the video was to motivate entrepreneurs--hell, anyone--to go out and do something, make a difference.
This video was never created so that we could monopolize the message, "entrepreneurs can change the world," but there are certainly lots of ways to get this message across without replicating someone else's campaign (especially if you have the resources of Ogilvy & Mather). After all, we were open to sharing the video. In fact, we even released it under the Creative Commons license so anyone could download it, show it at conferences, company meetings or anything else. What's more, we removed our branding almost entirely so that people could just use the video to motivate people. Instead, a very large ad agency decided it would be easier to just "borrow" the feel of our messaging, and not even engage in a partnership that would truly help entrepreneurs (there are definitely ways to do this, American Express).
End result? We're not whining about Ogilvy's usage of our message, we just think it's kind of lame for a big ad agency to come in and take messaging from an entrepreneurial company. Not holding people accountable for their actions is what has put our society in the turmoil we're in today, and I think Ogilvy & Mather should be held accountable, too. Yes, "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery," but I think it might have been more authentic if Ogilvy & Mather had just come up with their own campaign. Moreover, it would've been cool if AmEx had considered a partnership with us to help entrepreneurs, or raise awareness on an even greater level of how entrepreneurs really can change the world, without using someone else's original ideas. (AmEx execs, if you're reading this, give me a call.)
All of the data is here. Draw your own conclusions. Either way, I hope you'll consider spreading the word about the video that inspired it all, "Entrepreneurs can change the world," as well as the important message that we really are capable of turning the country, and the world, around.







